May 8, 2008

Dude, when did Hillary Clinton start channelling Strom Thurmond?

Today, two days after Andrea Mitchell stood in front of MSNBC's audience and reported that the Clinton camp was discounting the results of the North Carolina primary because of the large population of African Americans that make up that state's population, Hillary Clinton had this to say during a USA Today interview:

"Senator Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how the whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me... I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on."
I'd like to say something profound about the fact that this country was founded on the premise of the existence of certain specific truths and that the Clintons, through this specific episode of their habitual conduct, have demonstrated that they have forsaken such truths in favor of Machiavellian relativism. But instead, in retort to their most recent unpleasantness, I'll rely on the words of JFK, "Race has no place in American life or law."

While JFK was in the midst of renouncing an entire wing of the Democratic party, George H. W. Bush making a deal with the Texas chapter of the John Birch Society. He recognized that if the Republicans were going to wrest control of the federal government from the Democratic majority, the Republicans needed in their party what has become euphemistically known as the "Reagan Democrats."

So, the senior Bush made a deal with segregationists and by the end of the century, the Republicans controlled the Presidency and both houses of Congress.

Now, almost 50 years later, Hillary Clinton - in pursuit of her electoral map - wants to undo the reforms championed by Eleanor Roosevelt and JFK - the heroes of the modern Democratic party. Untethered to any truth whatsoever, she has not only demonstrated her habitual willingness to abandon the principles underlying the very foundation of this country, she now has "thrown under the bus" the core principles of our party.

Excuse me while I go puke.

I can't help but take this moment to observe that the Clintons made the current Bush administration possible. We Liberals lament the Bush-Cheney administration's ability to warp words past any semblance of meaning. Yet, it was our blindness to the Clintons that made the current administration's transgressions politically possible. The Clintons were the first to throw truth under the bus of political expediency. Karl Rove just chased us down the slipper slope they started us down.

After this episode, here's to hoping that once Clinton finally sinks into the abyss she has crawled into, New Yorkers do the right thing and vote Ms. Rodham out of office.

Like George W. Bush, she has no place in American politics.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

As I’ve said elsewhere, like it or not, Senator Clinton was stating a basic fact about Obama.

That fact is that since the Pastor Disaster, the “untrained ear” comment in his Philadelphia speech (in the biggest Civil War abolitionist State no less), his “typical white person” comment a day or two later (again in Pennsylvania), and his racist “Bittergate” comment (against Pennsylvania’s white working-class), Obama’s been bleeding white working-class Democrats by the second. In other States, he was doing relatively well with these voters before these self-inflicted wounds and, since that time, he’s been getting hammered by these voters who have moved in unison to Senator Clinton.

The “white working-class” are the vast majority of Americans. If you don’t even have their support among Democrats, you stand little to no chance of gaining “white working-class” Independents and crossover Republicans.

Do you know what that means? It means that you get blown out in the key States that you need to win to put together an Electoral College victory. That’s her point–and she’s correct. They’re the hardest and most important constituency to win over, and once they turn against you, they’re the hardest to get back. Parenthetically, they also love their War Heros. Get it?

Lexi

DeWitt said...

The entire premise of your point is questionnable. By conducting her campaign in this manner - by selling the soul of the Democratic party in exchange for the CHANCE that white working-class voters may support her over McCain - Hillary Clinton risks alienating a significant portion of the Democratic base that she would need to win the election.

I suppose you'd say the base will vote D no matter how terribly Hillary rejects the principles of the base. That may be true, but I am also sure that the base will come out in far fewer numbers to support a candidate who, by making these statements, has forsaken the bedrock principles of the Democratic party.

And turnout of the Democratic base, more than winning the votes of a few swing voters who can't look past the color of Obama's skin, will win the fall election.

And if you don't think what Hillary said is racist tripe, consider what would happen if Obama said the exact same thing, but instead referred to the "black working-class" which incidentally make up a far more significant and consistent part of the Democratic party than the "white working-class" who more often than not vote Republican?

If he did make such a statement, I suspect Obama would get blasted by people like yourself for playing the race card. Whereas Clinton has played the race card, and people like yourself are lauding her for it.